afflatusexarch: (( ew ) g55)
G'raha Tia ([personal profile] afflatusexarch) wrote in [community profile] escordvi 2024-01-08 02:37 am (UTC)

[ He wants to ask if the elimination would be before any criminal activity had actually been done or not - even just preplanning. Would these theoretical people be held accountable for having done nothing or at least after they have attempted something?

Instead, his ears perk at the change in Daqiang's tone. G'raha looks at the man with a tilted head. First person and speaking of a brother. ]


I know your point isn't to have me inquire about this relationship you must has with your brother. The point is the oath, yes. Normally I would agree. However, even that can be... Deceptive. There are times where people do not see some actions as a betrayal of oaths.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting